Bi-Quarterly Political Knowledge

The model of the governance system of the Islamic Republic of Iran Based on the statement of the second step of the Islamic revolution

Document Type : Science - Research (Public Science and Governance)

Authors

1 PhD student in policy making, University of Science and Technology, Tehran, I.R.Iran. (Corresponding author)

2 Professor and Faculty Member in University of Science and Technology, Tehran, I.R.Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, University of Science and Technology, Tehran, I.R.Iran.

10.30497/pkn.2023.243479.3016

Abstract

The serious obstacles and problems faced by Iran's Islamic Revolution in the first fourteen decades of its lofty goals have caused, despite significant progress, the maximum standards of the ideals of the Islamic Revolution have not been realized as it should be. The Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution of Iran has stated that the main step of the movement at the current stage is the creation of the Islamic State, and by issuing a statement on the second step of the revolution, he has ushered in a new era. Based on this, the governance system of the Islamic Republic of Iran needs people who are hard-working, efficient, committed, adhere to religious, revolutionary, creative values ​​and such things so that the power of decision-making can be felt more. Therefore, by developing a model for the governance system of the Islamic Republic of Iran based on the statement of the second step of the Islamic Revolution, an attempt is made to dry up the root of many cultural, economic and social issues and problems. Considering that the superior and successful models of the countries cannot necessarily be suitable for the country with the goals of Islamic transcendental governance, for this purpose, in this research, using the data model of the foundation, the model of the appropriate governance system is extracted. To test the model in this research, Kappa method and Lausche coefficient are used. Finally, in order to ensure the correct correspondence of the components in each dimension of the model, confirmatory factor analysis has been used. The findings show that proper use of resources and capacities, creativity and innovation, rationality and logic, people's participation and long-term and forward-looking strengthening are among the strategies to reach the governance system based on the statement of the second step of the revolution.

Keywords

Main Subjects

اکبری، زهرا؛ حکاک، محمد؛ وحدتی، حجت‌اله و نظرپوری، هوشنگ (1398). «طراحی الگوی سه‌شاخگی حکمرانی خوب در سازمان‌های چندسطحی»، مطالعات مدیریت راهبردی. (40)، 201-175.
خمینی، روح‌الله (1379). صحیفه نور: مجموعه رهنمودهای حضرت امام ‌خمینی (رحمت‌الله‌علیه). تهران: وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی، سازمان چاپ و انتشارات.
دارینی، محمود ( 1382). «سیـری در اندیشه سیاسی امام خمینی»، نشریه حضور، (46).
علوی، سیدمسلم؛ رعنایی کردشولی، حبیب‌اله؛ علی‌محمدلو، مسلم و سلیمی، قاسم (1399). «طراحی الگوی حکمرانی دانشگاه نسل سوم با رویکرد مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری جامع»، نشریه مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی در نظام‌های آموزشی. 1(14)، 254-213.
فطانت فردحقیقی، میلاد؛ زین‌آبادی، حسن‌رضا؛ آراسته، حمیدرضا و نوه ابراهیم، عبدالرحیم (1400)، «طراحی الگوی حکمرانی مطلوب در نظام آموزش عالی»، فصلنامه علمی مطالعات راهبردی سیاست‌گذاری عمومی. 11(38)، 347-324.
کمالان، سید مهدی (1395)، قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران مصوب 1358 و بازنگری 1368.
ملکی فاراب، ندا؛ شجاع نوری، فروغ الصباح؛ بستان نجفی، حسین؛ حسینیان، سیمین؛ لبیبی، محمدمهدی و پورحسین، رضا (1398). «تدوین شاخص‌ها و ترسیم الگوی خانواده تراز اسلام (از منظر آیات قرآن و روایات) با بهره‌گیری از تکنیک پژوهش کیفی داده‌بنیاد»، فصلنامه فرهنگ مشاوره و روان درمانی. 10(40)، 70-29.
منوریان، عباس؛ نرگسیان، عباس و حسینی مکارم، عاطفه (1398). «طراحی مدل حکمرانی شبکه‌ای در شهرداری تهران»، فصلنامه علمی اقتصاد و مدیریت شهری. 7(3)، 123-109.
نادری، مهدی و پیرانی، شهره (1399). «راهبردهای پیشرو در پساچهل‌سالگی انقلاب اسلامی (تبیین بیانیه گام دوم انقلاب اسلامی)»، نشریه علمی دانش سیاسی. 16(1)، 328-305.
Anazodo, U. C.; Confidence, R.; Zhang, D.; Fatade, A.; Obungoloch, J.; Akgun, C.; ... & Dako13, F. MICCAI 2022 FAIR WORKSHOP.
Anderson, M.; Schulze, K.; Cassini, A.; Plachouras, D. & Mossialos, E. (2019). “A governance framework for development and assessment of national action plans on antimicrobial resistance”, The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 19(11), e371-e384.
Ansell, C. & Torfing, J. (2022). Introduction to the Handbook on Theories of Governance. In Handbook on Theories of Governance (pp. 1-16). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bevir, M. & R.A.W. Rhodes (2003). Interpreting British Governance. London: Routledge.
Charmaz, K. & Thornberg, R. (2021). “The pursuit of quality in grounded theory”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 305-327.
Jessop, B. (1998), “The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development”, International Social Science Journal, 50 (155), 29-45.
Jessop, B. (2002). The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity.
Kickert, W.J.M., E.H. Klijn and J.F.M. Koppenjan (eds) (1997). Managing Complex Networks. London: Sage.
Klijn, E. H. (2008). “Governance and governance networks in Europe”, Public Management Review. 10(4), 505-525.
Kooiman, J. (ed.) (1993). Modern Governance. London: Sage.
Lomi, Alessandro & J. Richard Harrison (2012). “The garbage can model of organizational choice: Looking forward at forty”, in Alessandro Lomi and J. Richard Harrison (eds), The Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice, Bingley: Emerald, pp. 3-17.
Marks, G. (1993). Structural policy and multi-level governance in the EC. in A. Cafruny and G.
Mayer, R.C.; J.H. Davis & D. Schoorman (1995). “An integrative model of organizational trust”, Academy of Management Review. (20), 709-734.
Mayntz, R. (1993). Modernization and the logic of interorganizational networks. in J. Child, M.
Nelson, L. K. (2020). “Computational grounded theory: A methodological framework”, Sociological Methods & Research. 49(1), 3-42.
Revkin, M. R. (2021). “Competitive governance and displacement decisions under rebel rule: evidence from the Islamic State in Iraq”, Journal of conflict resolution. 65(1), 46-80.
Robert, C. (2021). Depoliticisation at the European Level: Delegitimisation and Circumvention of Representative Democracy in Europe’s Governance. In Rethinking politicisation in politics, sociology and international Relations (pp. 201-222). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Sahlin, K. (2014). ‘A global rise in the interest in management and governance of universities: Rankings and organization models on the move’, in G. Drori, M. Höllerer and P. Walgenbach (eds), Organization and Management Ideas: Global Themes and Local Variations, New York: Routledge, pp. 52-64.
Sako, M. (1998). ‘The information requirements of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from Japan, Europe and the United States’, in N. Lazaric and E Lorenz (eds), Trust and Economic Learning, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 23–47.
Scharpf, F.W. (1994). “Games real actors could play: Positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations”, Journal of Theoretical Politics. 6(1), 27-53.
Stoker, Gerry (2010). “Blockages on the road to relevance: Why has political science failed to deliver?”, European Political Science, 9 (Supplement 1), S72-S84.
Taleshi, M. & Kaffash, H. (2019). “Compilation and Validation of the Fundamental Criteria for the Integrated Management of Water Resources in Dry and Semi-arid Regions”, The Journal of Geographical Research on Desert Areas, 6(2), 81-108.
Vabo, Signy Irene and Asbjørn Røiseland (2012). “Conceptualizing the tools of government in urban network governance”, International Journal of Public Administration. 35(14), 934-946.
World Bank (2007). A Decade for Measuring the Quality of Governance. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Bi-Quarterly Political Knowledge
Volume 19, Issue 1 - Serial Number 37
ESSAY
March 2023
Pages 1-28
  • Receive Date: 29 July 2022
  • Revise Date: 08 February 2023
  • Accept Date: 15 February 2023